NE Sacramento News

The California state budget hearings continue to reveal differing opinions among lawmakers regarding the allocation of funds across various sectors. Recently, several subcommittees discussed issues ranging from education funding cuts to the effectiveness of climate policies.

During a meeting of Subcommittee #1, which focuses on education, concerns were raised over Governor Newsom's proposal to cut $1.2 billion in funding for California State University (CSU) and University of California (UC). Both the CSU Chancellor and UC President testified that such reductions would lead to fewer classes and diminished student services. Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh (R-Yucaipa) expressed her disapproval, stating, “I’m very concerned about students’ ability to afford a public education, particularly at UC and CSU.” She argued that funding for these institutions has not been prioritized under Governor Newsom’s administration.

Subcommittee #2 examined the financial impact of California’s climate policies. Senator Choi (R-Irvine) questioned recent budget allocations toward new climate programs. He emphasized that existing programs could achieve similar emissions reductions more cost-effectively. Choi stated, “We can achieve similar emissions reductions by investing in existing programs rather than creating new ones.” He urged reconsideration of funding for ineffective or unaffordable initiatives amidst budget deficits.

In discussions led by Subcommittee #4 on state administration and general government, attention turned to business fees collected by the Secretary of State. Senator Roger Niello (R-Fair Oaks) highlighted concerns over fee revenues being used beyond their intended purpose. The Business Fees Fund has transferred substantial amounts—$180 million between 2011-2021—to the General Fund. Niello remarked that this practice resembles a tax on businesses, suggesting fees are higher than necessary and advocating for either their reduction or legislative approval as taxes.

These deliberations underscore ongoing debates over fiscal priorities in California's budget planning process.